Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5-Plus
Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · Xiaomi (≤256K tier) vs Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (≤128K tier) · prices and specs, line by line
Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 Pro (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · Xiaomi (≤256K tier)) vs Qwen3.5-Plus (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (≤128K tier)), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.
| Dimension | Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 Pro | Qwen3.5-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor / channel | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · Xiaomi (≤256K tier) | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (≤128K tier) |
| Context window | 1000K | 1000K |
| Modalities | Text | Text |
| Features | Xiaomi open-source, Reasoning model | Balanced general use, Open-source ecosystem |
| Input (cache miss) | ¥7 | ¥0.8 |
| Output | ¥21 | ¥4.8 |
| Cache hit | Not published | Not published |
| Time-based pricing | ||
| Est. monthly cost* | ¥92.40 | ¥16.32 |
| Price source | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing | Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing |
| Verified | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.
Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)
- Estimated monthly cost: Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 Pro ¥92.40 vs Qwen3.5-Plus ¥16.32 on a common CNY basis (list prices ¥92.40 / ¥16.32) — at this fixed usage, Qwen3.5-Plus is cheaper by ¥76.08/month.
- Cost ratio: under this basis, Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 Pro costs about 5.7× Qwen3.5-Plus (Qwen3.5-Plus is ~82% cheaper). The ratio holds only at the current list prices, reference rate and fixed usage assumptions; it says nothing about capability, output quality or overall value.
- Input unit price (off-peak / single-price basis): list prices ¥7 vs ¥0.8; after conversion Qwen3.5-Plus is lower (by ≈ ¥6.2/1M tokens).
- Output unit price (off-peak / single-price basis): list prices ¥21 vs ¥4.8; after conversion Qwen3.5-Plus is lower (by ≈ ¥16.2/1M tokens).
- Cache-hit price (off-peak basis): Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 Pro publishes no cache price (estimated at the standard input price); Qwen3.5-Plus publishes no cache price (estimated at the standard input price).
- Context window: identical at 1000K.
- Modalities: identical — Text.
- Price sources: Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing (verified 2026-09-18), Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing (verified 2026-09-18); unit: official list price per 1M tokens (Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 Pro in CNY, Qwen3.5-Plus in CNY).
These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.