/ Model comparison / Hunyuan TurboS Vision vs Qwen3.5-Plus

Hunyuan TurboS Vision vs Qwen3.5-Plus

Tencent Cloud vs Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (≤128K tier) · prices and specs, line by line

Hunyuan TurboS Vision (Tencent Cloud) vs Qwen3.5-Plus (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (≤128K tier)), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionHunyuan TurboS VisionQwen3.5-Plus
Vendor / channel Tencent Cloud Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (≤128K tier)
Context window 128K 1000K
Modalities Text, Image understanding Text
Features Multimodal, Tencent ecosystem Balanced general use, Open-source ecosystem
Input (cache miss) ¥3 ¥0.8
Output ¥9 ¥4.8
Cache hit Not published Not published
Time-based pricing
Est. monthly cost* ¥39.60 ¥16.32
Price source Tencent Cloud Hunyuan billing Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing
Verified 2026-09-18 2026-09-18

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → Hunyuan TurboS Vision profile Qwen3.5-Plus profile