/ Model comparison / GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna

GLM-5.3-Flash vs GPT-6 Luna

Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · Zhipu (direct) vs OpenAI · prices and specs, line by line

GLM-5.3-Flash (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · Zhipu (direct)) vs GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionGLM-5.3-FlashGPT-6 Luna
Vendor / channel Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · Zhipu (direct) OpenAI
Context window 1024K 1050K
Modalities Text, Image understanding, Video understanding Text, Image understanding
Features Lightweight, low cost, Thinking-only mode Low cost at scale, Efficient, lightweight
Input (cache miss) ¥0.8 Input ≤272K $0.1 Input >272K (long context) not published
Output ¥2.8 Input ≤272K $0.5 Input >272K (long context) not published
Cache hit ¥0.23 Input ≤272K $0.01 Input >272K (long context) not published
Time-based pricing
Est. monthly cost* ¥10.49
¥10.49
$1.64
≈ ¥11.00
Price source Alibaba Cloud Model Studio — GLM-5.3-Flash model page OpenAI API pricing
Verified 2026-10-28 2026-10-28

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → GLM-5.3-Flash profile GPT-6 Luna profile