/ Model comparison / Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.5-Plus

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3.5-Plus

Google vs Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (≤128K tier) · prices and specs, line by line

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Google) vs Qwen3.5-Plus (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (≤128K tier)), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteQwen3.5-Plus
Vendor / channel Google Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (≤128K tier)
Context window 1024K 1000K
Modalities Text, Image understanding, Video understanding Text
Features High-volume light tasks, Translation & data processing Balanced general use, Open-source ecosystem
Input (cache miss) $0.25 ¥0.8
Output $1.5 ¥4.8
Cache hit $0.025 Not published
Time-based pricing
Est. monthly cost* $4.69
≈ ¥31.54
¥16.32
¥16.32
Price source Google AI pricing Alibaba Cloud Model Studio pricing
Verified 2026-10-28 2026-09-18

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite profile Qwen3.5-Plus profile