/ Model comparison / Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3

Google vs Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · prices and specs, line by line

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Google) vs Kimi K3 (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteKimi K3
Vendor / channel Google Alibaba Cloud Model Studio
Context window 1024K 1024K
Modalities Text, Image understanding, Video understanding Text, Image understanding
Features High-volume light tasks, Translation & data processing Ultra-long context, Long-document parsing
Input (cache miss) $0.25 ¥20
Output $1.5 ¥100
Cache hit $0.025 ¥2
Time-based pricing
Est. monthly cost* $4.69
≈ ¥31.54
¥327.60
¥327.60
Price source Google AI pricing Alibaba Cloud Model Studio — Kimi K3 model page
Verified 2026-10-28 2026-10-28

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite profile Kimi K3 profile