/ Model comparison / Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan TurboS Vision

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan TurboS Vision

Google vs Tencent Cloud · prices and specs, line by line

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Google) vs Hunyuan TurboS Vision (Tencent Cloud), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteHunyuan TurboS Vision
Vendor / channel Google Tencent Cloud
Context window 1024K 128K
Modalities Text, Image understanding, Video understanding Text, Image understanding
Features High-volume light tasks, Translation & data processing Multimodal, Tencent ecosystem
Input (cache miss) $0.25 ¥3
Output $1.5 ¥9
Cache hit $0.025 Not published
Time-based pricing
Est. monthly cost* $4.69
≈ ¥31.54
¥39.60
¥39.60
Price source Google AI pricing Tencent Cloud Hunyuan billing
Verified 2026-10-28 2026-09-18

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite profile Hunyuan TurboS Vision profile