/ Model comparison / Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6 Luna

Google vs OpenAI · prices and specs, line by line

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Google) vs GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionGemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-6 Luna
Vendor / channel Google OpenAI
Context window 1024K 1050K
Modalities Text, Image understanding, Video understanding Text, Image understanding
Features High-volume light tasks, Translation & data processing Low cost at scale, Efficient, lightweight
Input (cache miss) $0.25 Input ≤272K $0.1 Input >272K (long context) not published
Output $1.5 Input ≤272K $0.5 Input >272K (long context) not published
Cache hit $0.025 Input ≤272K $0.01 Input >272K (long context) not published
Time-based pricing
Est. monthly cost* $4.69 $1.64
Price source Google AI pricing OpenAI API pricing
Verified 2026-10-28 2026-10-28

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite profile GPT-6 Luna profile