/ Model comparison / DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

DeepSeek vs Google · prices and specs, line by line

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (DeepSeek) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Google), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Vendor / channel DeepSeek Google
Context window 1000K 1024K
Modalities Text, Image understanding Text, Image understanding, Video understanding
Features Half price off-peak, Best for batch jobs, Fast reasoning High-volume light tasks, Translation & data processing
Input (cache miss) Peak ¥2 / off-peak ¥1 $0.25
Output Peak ¥8 / off-peak ¥4 $1.5
Cache hit Peak ¥0.04 / off-peak ¥0.02 $0.025
Time-based pricing Off-peak ≈ half of peak (peak=Weekdays 9:00-12:00, 14:00-18:00)
Est. monthly cost* ¥13.84
¥13.84
$4.69
≈ ¥31.54
Price source Tencent Cloud TokenHub pricing Google AI pricing
Verified 2026-09-18 2026-10-28

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → DeepSeek V4.1 Flash profile Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite profile