/ Model comparison / DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Tencent Cloud (official direct) vs Google · prices and specs, line by line

DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Tencent Cloud (official direct)) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite (Google), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Vendor / channel Tencent Cloud (official direct) Google
Context window 1000K 1024K
Modalities Text Text, Image understanding, Video understanding
Features Flagship reasoning, Half price off-peak, Strong agent skills High-volume light tasks, Translation & data processing
Input (cache miss) Peak ¥9 / off-peak ¥4.5 $0.25
Output Peak ¥27 / off-peak ¥13.5 $1.5
Cache hit Peak ¥0.3 / off-peak ¥0.15 $0.025
Time-based pricing Off-peak ≈ half of peak (peak=Weekdays 9:00-12:00, 14:00-18:00)
Est. monthly cost* ¥51.57
¥51.57
$4.69
≈ ¥31.54
Price source Tencent Cloud TokenHub pricing Google AI pricing
Verified 2026-09-18 2026-10-28

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 profile Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite profile