/ Model comparison / Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

Anthropic vs Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · Zhipu (direct) · prices and specs, line by line

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Anthropic) vs GLM-5.3-Flash (Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · Zhipu (direct)), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionClaude Sonnet 5.5GLM-5.3-Flash
Vendor / channel Anthropic Alibaba Cloud Model Studio · Zhipu (direct)
Context window 1024K 1024K
Modalities Text, Image understanding Text, Image understanding, Video understanding
Features Balanced workhorse, Agentic coding Lightweight, low cost, Thinking-only mode
Input (cache miss) $2 ¥0.8
Output $10 ¥2.8
Cache hit $0.1 ¥0.23
Time-based pricing
Est. monthly cost* $32.58
≈ ¥218.87
¥10.49
¥10.49
Price source Anthropic official pricing Alibaba Cloud Model Studio — GLM-5.3-Flash model page
Verified 2026-10-28 2026-10-28

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → Claude Sonnet 5.5 profile GLM-5.3-Flash profile