/ Model comparison / Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna

Anthropic vs OpenAI · prices and specs, line by line

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Anthropic) vs GPT-6 Luna (OpenAI), side by side: input/output/cache-hit prices, time-based pricing, context window, modalities and a fixed-assumption monthly cost. Green marks the better row.

DimensionClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Luna
Vendor / channel Anthropic OpenAI
Context window 1024K 1050K
Modalities Text, Image understanding Text, Image understanding
Features Low-cost, lightweight, Subtask agent Low cost at scale, Efficient, lightweight
Input (cache miss) Prompt ≤100K $0.1 Prompt >100K $0.5 Input ≤272K $0.1 Input >272K (long context) not published
Output Prompt ≤100K $0.5 Prompt >100K $2.5 Input ≤272K $0.5 Input >272K (long context) not published
Cache hit Prompt ≤100K $0.01 Prompt >100K $0.05 Input ≤272K $0.01 Input >272K (long context) not published
Time-based pricing
Est. monthly cost* $1.64 (tied) $1.64 (tied)
Price source Anthropic official pricing OpenAI API pricing
Verified 2026-10-28 2026-10-28

* Fixed assumptions for the example monthly cost: 100 calls/day · 2,000 input / 800 output tokens per call · off-peak rates · 30% cache hit rate · 30-day month — the same formula and defaults as the cost calculator. USD models are converted to CNY at the reference rate for comparison (see summary). Costs within display precision are marked tied; neither side is favored.

Comparison summary (fixed usage basis)

These are computations from published list prices under fixed call volume, token usage, cache assumptions and billing rules. They are not rankings of capability, output quality or overall value, and do not constitute purchase advice.

Calculate with your own usage → Claude Haiku 5.5 profile GPT-6 Luna profile